Sonagol Namibe

Sonangol Namibe Incident and Regional Security

by Sanvee Gupta
0 comments

Location: Northern Persian Gulf / Kuwait

Photo by Social media

Summary

Following the explosion on the Suezmax tanker Sonangol Namibe on March 4, conflicting reports regarding environmental damage and the exact location of the attack have emerged. While UKMTO initially reported an oil spill from a breached cargo tank, the vessel’s operator, Sonangol Marine Services, maintains that only a port ballast tank was damaged and no pollution has occurred. Kuwaiti authorities have clarified that the incident took place outside their territorial waters, approximately 60 kilometres from Mubarak Al-Kabeer Port. Security assessments suggest the use of an explosives-laden boat, a tactic officially claimed by Iranian-linked sources.

Learn more about maritime incidents or accidents at maritime-hub.com.

Sonagol Namibe side shell damage

The Facts

  • Vessel Involved: The Suezmax tanker Sonangol Namibe.

  • Incident Timing: The explosion occurred on a Wednesday night.

  • Geographic Position: Approximately 30 nautical miles southeast of Kuwait’s Mubarak al Kabeer port.

  • Nature of Damage: A hull breach on the port side has caused the ship to take on water.

  • Cargo Status: The vessel was in ballast (empty of cargo) at the time of the blast.

  • Suspected Method: A small craft was seen fleeing the scene, suggesting the possible use of a hand-placed charge or limpet mine.

  • Casualties: There are no reported injuries to the crew and no fires on board.

Current Status and Environmental Impact

  • Vessel Stability: The Sonangol Namibe remains stable and safely afloat despite taking on water in a port ballast tank.

  • Pollution Dispute: UKMTO and some maritime security firms continue to report oil in the water, citing a potential “symbolic” rather than catastrophic spill. However, the operator confirms the ship was in ballast and expects no cargo-related leak.

  • Loading Status: Before the attack, the tanker was under contract with Iraq’s State Organisation for Marketing of Oil (SOMO) to load 80,000 tonnes of fuel.

Security and Military Response

  • Attribution: The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed its naval forces targeted a “US tanker” in the northern Gulf on March 5, a claim likely referring to the Bahamas-flagged Sonangol Namibe.

  • Attack Vector: Initial assessments from Iraqi port security sources suggest a remote-controlled boat laden with explosives was used for the strike.

  • Kuwaiti Defensive Actions: The Kuwaiti Ministry of Defense reported intercepting a missile that breached its airspace on March 5, though this was separate from the tanker incident.

  • Regional Disruption: Major shipping entities, including Cosco, have suspended services to and from Gulf countries, including Kuwait, due to the escalating “Iran War” maritime threat.

Official Statements

  • Kuwaiti Ministry of Interior: “The explosion happened outside Kuwaiti territorial waters, at least 60 kilometres from Mubarak Al-Kabeer Port”.

  • Sonangol Marine Services: “A port ballast tank is losing water, which suggests some form of hull breach, but the ship remains stable and safely afloat”.

  • IRGC (via State Media): Claimed “complete control” of the Strait of Hormuz and reported targeting a vessel in the northern Gulf that was allegedly “on fire”.


Sources:

You may also like